no ... not a football referee, but a referee for peer-reviewed journals, and in this case, journals in the field of library & information science.
My e-buddy Phil Edwards has written a nice piece in the November 2007 issue of College & Research Libraries News offering tips on how to be a good reviewer. In Developing as a writer: Refereeing manuscripts for peer-reviewed LIS journals, Phil suggests ways to become a referee, and includes his two handy criteria for accepting requests to be a peer-reviewer:
For More Information
My e-buddy Phil Edwards has written a nice piece in the November 2007 issue of College & Research Libraries News offering tips on how to be a good reviewer. In Developing as a writer: Refereeing manuscripts for peer-reviewed LIS journals, Phil suggests ways to become a referee, and includes his two handy criteria for accepting requests to be a peer-reviewer:
- I already know something about the topic of the article or the method of investigation.
- I read the journal regularly and have a feel for what a typical article looks like in that publication.
"...[A] comment such as 'The introduction is unclear' might be less helpful for authorial revisions than a comment like 'In the introduction, the author mentions the relationship between issues X and Y. Throughout the article, X appears often, while Y does not appear until the conclusion. The author should either consider reinforcing this proposed relationship throughout the narrative or focus the discussion on issue X exclusively.' "His other suggestions are useful as well, and he lists some handy resources for further consultation on the topic.
For More Information
- Edwards, Phillip M. Developing as a writer: Refereeing manuscripts for peer-reviewed LIS journals. College & Research Libraries News, November 2007. p. 630-631.
No comments:
Post a Comment